I'm still not entirely sure what you're referring to. However, assuming you're talking about a cricket match, it seems like you're saying that England made some breakthroughs in the game after Harry Brook played well.
Without additional context, it's difficult for me to provide a more detailed response. However, if you have any specific questions or if there's anything else you'd like me to clarify, I'm happy to try and help.
It's possible that you're referring to the English cricketer Ben Duckett, who is known for his aggressive batting style and ability to score runs quickly. When someone says that Ben Duckett "cut loose," it usually means that he played a particularly attacking innings, perhaps hitting a lot of boundaries or scoring runs at a high rate.
Duckett has played for various teams in English domestic cricket, as well as for the England cricket team at various levels. He has a reputation for being a dynamic and explosive batsman, and has scored several impressive innings throughout his career so far.
Without further context, I can only assume that this is what you are referring to. If you have any specific questions about Ben Duckett or cricket in general, feel free to ask!
New Zealand 37 for 3 (Conway 17*, Wagner 4*) trail England 325 for 9 dec (Brook 89, Duckett 84) by 288 runs
Another day, another display of genre-busting Test cricket from England's incorrigible Bazballers.
Which aspect of this latest instalment most tickles your fancy? The idea that either or both of Ben Duckett and Harry Brook could, and maybe at least one of them should, have crushed Gilbert Jessop's 121-year-old, 76-ball record for the fastest England hundred? Or what about the sight of Joe Root, England's modern great Test batter, being caught at slip while attempting a ramp shot on the first afternoon of a Test? Or how about Ben Stokes' latest captaincy pièce de résistance - a first-innings declaration after a mere 58.2 overs, the second-quickest such gesture in Test history? England by that stage had romped along to a typically freestyle 325 for 9, at a rate of 5.77 an over, and with arguably only Ollie Pope the victim of anything that could conventionally be described as old-school bowling "pressure". When your minds are as free as lads on a golfing holiday, an attack featuring two nervy debutants holds few fears, notwithstanding the enduring class of Tim Southee and the indefatigable Neil Wagner.
England's innings wasn't quite as eye-popping as their last first day of a series - their 506 for 4 in Rawalpindi in December - but its denouement was notable in its own right. It's hard even to classify their declaration as a "gamble", given England's high-rolling Test lifestyle, but it was a typically calculated move from Stokes. It left New Zealand facing a 90-minute examination under Mount Maunganui's full-beam floodlights, and by the time they had tottered to 37 for 3 in 18 overs before the close, it had paid rich and irresistible dividends.
Ollie Robinson - already regarded by his team-mates as the equal of his seniors James Anderson and Stuart Broad - wasn't kept waiting long to live up to his heightened status. Introduced for the fifth over, he duly struck with his third ball as Tom Latham fenced limply to short leg, whereupon the ageless Anderson switched ends to pluck out two of New Zealand's batting mainstays with the typically miserly figures of 2 for 11 in seven overs.
Though he was denied the early wicket of Devon Conway by a bad drop from Zak Crawley at second slip, Crawley soon made it up to his team-mate with a tougher take to see off Henry Nicholls, by which stage Anderson had already landed the biggest fish, Kane Williamson for 6, via a successfully reviewed lbw. Those two scalps, incidentally, carried Broad and Anderson's partnership haul to 999 and counting… at some stage on Friday, you'd expect them to reach four figures, let alone McGrath and Warne's record of 1001.
